Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustMock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

JustMock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  01:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  23:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable per the GNG - no coverage in independent, reliable sources. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with nom; there are sources but few that look to be independent of the subject. Certainly not enough to pass WP:GNG from what I can see. Re-prints of company announcements, the company's own blog, etc. A search didn't bring up much else. Stalwart 111  23:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.