Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustSpeed 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus, keep (again!). Johnleemk | Talk 05:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

JustSpeed
Non-notable Compu  ter  Jo  e  21:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per discussion closed today. -- JJay 21:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * you're kidding right? someone closed this at nine ten this morning and it's been resubmitted at nine thirty this evening!? Get Real!!! SPEEDY KEEP Jcuk 22:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. I agree with Jjay and Jcuk. It's silly to renominate 12 hours after closing prior AFD, and nominator must have seen it because he used the old AFD page instead of creating a new one.  The nominator also didn't justify the nomination.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 02:47Z 
 * Strong keep per above Werdna648T/C\@ 10:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, er... Nerocruft? Difficult to understand whether this really is a common feature or just in Nero. May only have been recently closed, but closed with two deletes, one keep, and one sort-of keep which seems to be going through a difficult phase and is unsure about its identity. Hardly a consensus to keep. It shouldn't have been nominated this early, but as long as it has been... --Malthusian (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Malthusian. Currently, "survives an AFD 12 hours ago" is not a reason for a speedy keep. Stifle 16:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete cruft and doesn't really warrant a merge as much as a complete rewrite. I'd normally object to instant relisting after someone closes an AfD, but this one clearly deserved relisting ("no consensus" with only three votes!) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is pretty obviously nn. Belongs in Wikibooks maybe. Ashibaka tock Save our rectangular corners! 01:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.