Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Dance 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Just Dance 5

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable "in development" video game, part of the Just Dance series. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  02:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This article is written based on an ad for casting, and a single other article that basically only restates the casting ad along with some speculation. According to crystal, Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors ... Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content.  Until there is at least official acknowledgement of the game's existence, the article probably doesn't belong. Millermk (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Game will probably be made, but there are no sources for WP:GNG at this time. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. It's a likely game, yes, but as of right now, it's not even officially announced, and it's just too soon. Sergecross73   msg me   16:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Just Dance Game the official Just Dance Facebook redirected me to the article saying that it will be out next october. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandeeps777 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Cresix (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. On an unrelated note it doesn't help that the article has been vandalized beyond repair... --ThomasO1989 (talk) 01:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.