Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Done Productions Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   02:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Just Done Productions Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Publishing company fails WP:GNG, sources are the org's own website, a resume directory, and a blog; can't find any coverage from WP:RS. Vrac (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you look at the various articles about the SA Military, many, if not most, of them cite books published by Just Done.
 * The GNG requires books/websites/articles about the publisher. The amount of publishing it has done is not necessarily important - what matters is that others have written about the company. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (collogue)  @ 14:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete full of primary sources. LibStar (talk) 03:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support notability. Only one ref is not to one of its published works, and it is from the subject.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.