Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Like That (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Just Like That (song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Unreleased demo song. Paul75 (talk) 03:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep for now - The article asserts individual notability for this song (It is considered by many to be the 'Holy Grail' of unreleased ABBA recordings), which is a valid reason for keeping it per WP:NSONGS if that can be verified with reliable sources. Additionally, the article already contains enough material for a full article-- it shouldn't be merged just for being a stub.  So, in conclusion, I think the problem is finding references to verify the material and notability of the song. Remember there's no WP:DEADLINE.  Where can we list this article so that interested parties can look for sources?  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  04:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: unreleased demo song - not notable WP:NSONGS. JamesBurns (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note – The above user has been blocked for using sock puppets to vote-stack at AfDs. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: non notable demo, did not chart. A-Kartoffel (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Struck !vote of sock puppet.  Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the unique nature of this song makes it notable in my opinion, even if it did not chart. -Drdisque (talk) 03:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is an interesting case, although I am inclined to agree with LinguistAtLarge, regarding keep for now. There is clearly a lot of information about this song, and if it can be sourced to multiple reliable sources, then the topic meets WP:NOTE.  Given the amount of information in the article, I am inclined to give the benefit of the doubt and presume that at least a portion of it can be reliably sourced to independent sources. Rlendog (talk) 18:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment it is incredibly poorly sourced, with two references for the entire article. It fails dismally on all other WP:SONG requirements, and the song is already covered in some detail on ABBA unreleased songs. I don't think there is any real justification for a seperate article for an unreleased, demo track.  Paul75 (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.