Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Sue Me


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of comedy films of the 2000s. Daniel (talk) 20:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Just Sue Me

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing suitable or reliable was found in Newspapers.com. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Because the cast is mildly notable and given the director has no page (yet), and because redirects are cheap, may I suggest to redirect to List of comedy films of the 2000s, where the film is not listed (yet)? Willing to add a line there with cast and director and a source (this one-short-line entry in TV guide for instance), if this solution is chosen. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  21:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC) NB- The film is listed in this list but I think that the comedy films one is a much better targe if redirect is chosen.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Amazed there isn't a review to be found, I vaguely remember this film. Rotten Tomatoes has none, Gnewspapers only seems to have movie theater listings for it.  Oaktree b (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - The article could be improved if there was more sources to go along with it, but if there's not enough information presented in a long time period, then the article should be deleted. But, I think it should be improved, then it will convince other viewers that the article passes notability. Geko72290 (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗ plicit  07:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to List of comedy films of the 2000s per Mushy Yank's suggestion. The current refs are obviously deficient and fails GNG, a search on Google, Google Books, and TWL finds trivial mentions and this newspaper piece. However, it mentions the film first then cover it in four sentences (one quoting the director) and fails WP:SIGCOV IMo.  VickKiang  (talk)  23:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.