Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Word


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  Nish kid 64  19:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Just Word

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a program in pre-alpha. Lots of crystal ballism, doesn't seem to fulfill WP:SOFTWARE. Delete Transfinite 23:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom; totally non-notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

You know I'm the developer of it. I can prove it if you want. But still, delete it if you want.Wikinerd2000 04:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL the text of the article is statement of it's lack of WP:N Jeepday 04:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It's not that we don't believe you, the problem is that the article has conflicts with Policies and guidelines like WP:V, WP:N, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:COI. If/when you get where you are headed and can meet the encyclopedic expectations you will not even have to write the article some fan will do it for you.  Jeepday 05:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Crystalballism, conflict of interest, zero Google hits for targetted search ; zero possibility of non-trivial treatment in multiple reliable source.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable because of uniquely advanced application for basic. Article has been edited to plainly assert notability. Not WP:CRYSTAL because it assert current status of project without making attenuated predictions. Has a Good Source Forge cite. Will look for other cites.Edivorce 17:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have looked far and wide for additional non-trival cites to no avail. I also now have a better understanding of SourceForge and see that it is self-authenticating.  I even download the app-- it seems to have good potential, but sadly that does not help verify the article.  I personally find deleting the work of other users distasteful so I won't argue for "delete" but need to withdraw my "keep." I wish user:Wikinerd2000 the best and I'm sure he will do great things. Edivorce 02:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.