Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice League (heroclix)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Heroclix. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-26 07:38Z

Justice League (heroclix)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

list of game figures, violates WP:NOT; Delete --Mhking 17:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason -- they are simply lists of game figures and as a result, violate WP:NOT:


 * Delete per WP:L and WP:NOT. YechielMan 18:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect though I have no inherent objection to articles on individual sets in the Heroclix franchise, these pages are indeed nothing but lists. I believe further content could be developed like the average set of Magic the Gathering on Wizkid's pirates game, but there's little to nothing on these pages that is worth including.  If somebody wants to take up the challenge of describing the sets as opposed to just listing there contents, I'll change my opinion FrozenPurpleCube 18:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Your assertion that these pages are nothing more than lists is correct. However, you should realize that we had, at one time, much more content regarding these sets and the pieces. They were deemed to have too much content and too many links and were targeted for deletion. In order to keep them up on Wikipedia, we pared it down to what you see today. Now you are saying that it is too little content!?!?! If the moderators would make these pages "protected" and not allow people who are not even registered users to modify and delete these pages, we could make them more interesting to gamers and potential gamers on Wikipedia. Firstlensman 13:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, perhaps you could provide a link to the diff of one of those better versions? Or perhaps you might want to work on the page in your user-space.  Right now, with just a list of characters, it's not very good.  What would make the pages better is a description of the reaction and response, how the set sold, and where appropriate, addition of new types of figures and modifications to the game rules.  FrozenPurpleCube 00:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 14:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete listing all the minatures in a given game is a bit outside what an encyclopedia can reasonably cover. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per YechielMan and Starblind. This is gamecruft of the lowest order. JuJube 21:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.