Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice Leak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Justice Leak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One role in The Great Debaters doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR. He does get a substantial (if negative) mention in The New York Times film review of Implanted, but that's about it. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per criterion 1 of WP:NACTOR: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." As the nominator pointed out, Leak had the leading role in Implanted (which is a notable film despite its lack of an article) and a main role in The Great Debaters, and as is said in the article, acted in Atlanta's longest running theater production. Seems notable enough to me. 97198 (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * When you get billed after "Pig Farmer" and just before "Harvard Debater #1" in The Great Debaters, it's questionable how significant your role is. As for Implanted, it appears to have been little seen and poorly rated (in IMDb). Clarityfiend (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per 97198's reasoning. Implanted is definitely a film that could have an article and just doesn't, but film isn't all that matters for WP:NACTOR. The theater production information easily matches "significant roles in...stage performances".  Corvoe  (be heard) 14:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  02:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Failing WP:NACTOR is not a valid reason for deletion. The article does cite multiple references and nominator finds another, which seems enough to pass WP:BASIC. --180.172.239.231 (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.