Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice for women, Bangladesh - JFWBD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Justice for women, Bangladesh - JFWBD

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable organization according to WP:ORG Kayser Ahmad (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lots of Facebook and I found one article that might be a reliable source but there isn't any WP:DEPTH here and therefore does not pass WP:N for inclusion. - Pmedema (talk) 03:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is an organization based on Facebook. So it might be useful to examine the Facebook pages in more detail. There may well be lots more information in Urdu for those able to check. It looks like an effective women's rights organization.--Ipigott (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - By all means, but I have a tendency to stay away from Facebook as a WP:RS as it is a WP:SELFSOURCE, but it might point a way to some other areas that could be used. - Pmedema (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  18:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't verify the content of the article because there are no sources. There is a facebook page link. However this is for a closed-group.  Which leave me with two articles found in searching.  and   Not enough notability for WP:ORG and content of articles needs to be verifiable. Gab4gab (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The organization is barely two years old. There's almost no English-language coverage. The Dhaka Tribune article that Gab4gab linked describes one action by the group. Its founder is on a list of 15 winners of "Inspiring Women Award 2017", implying that the organization is attracting some measure of recognition.


 * Searching for "জাস্টিস ফর উইমেন" returns wider and deeper coverage. The Ittefaq article that Gab4gab linked is a good start. Two other reliable sources are and, but I would prefer that these and other Bengali-language search results be evaluated by editors fully fluent in the language. Are they of sufficiently significant detail to satisfy WP:GNG? --Worldbruce (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

This organization is just social media based, no filed work. And see bn.Wikipedia delete this article for not notable org. আদরিনি আক্তার (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.