Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice kan singh parihar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete, blanked by creator, User:Jodmar. — Jun. 6, '06  [03:11] < [ freak]|[ talk] >

Justice kan singh parihar
Complete worship of some judge - absolute POV with no real detail of judgments delivered, opinions on various legal principles or matters etc - lawcruft. If it doesn't change to something useful instead of just extolling his many virtues in a badly written panegyric, then it doesn't really belong here SM247 20:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment WOW, that last paragraph's a doozy. This guy makes Solomon look like he was flipping a coin. The article's awful, but there are indications in the list of positions held that he may have had some decent notability. Perhaps some Indian editors could review this? There might be the makings of a decent stub once the hero-worship is excised. Fan1967 21:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * There is a website cited, but, except for a few headers, it looks like it's entirely in Hindi. Warning: don't try to open it with a slow connection. Looks like the whole site is printed documents scanned into jpegs. Fan1967 21:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, now that I've removed all the hero worship (which was copied from his website). A judge of the High Court of Rajasthan is equivalent to a state Supreme Court judge in the US, which is clearly notable. NawlinWiki 21:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note, article has been appropriately moved and is now at Kan Singh Parihar. I slapped on two stub tags: India-bio and Law-bio.GRBerry 02:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.