Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justification for terrorism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Justification for terrorism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

POV essay. I only recently discovered this one after finding Justification of Terrorism in Islam, which is also up for deletion for the same reason. Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 20:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * article has been changed back to how it was a year ago —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.223.124 (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no content here that is not covered in other articles. this doesnt appear to provide enough content to be a seed for an article on this subject, and can be safely deleted. if someone wants to create a full article on this subject, this article isnt necessary and is horribly incomplete.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - A section on justifications given by groups or people accused by legitimate governments of terrorism would be useful in Terrorism or Definition of terrorism, but now that I've removed the recent POV additions with dubious sources (details of deletions on article's talk page), there's little left to merge.  MuffledThud (talk) 08:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.