Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justification of copyright infringement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  delete. Core desat 03:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Justification of copyright infringement

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

terrible justification, not sourced at all, view of one person. Not for an encyclopedia LightSpeed3 (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Supposed sources do not discuss the supposed topic. This might work as a paper for class, but it is WP:OR here. (Unable to find this topic through various searches.) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Original research. No opposition to a proper article being created if sourced and verifiable, as the topic is notable. Stifle (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete -- it's not as all bad as that but needs work, and I'm not sure we need this given numerous other articles on the general topic. It is a reasonable list of some justifications that have been used, and it isn't problematically POV. --Dhartung | Talk 20:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.