Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Justin Bere

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an architect, there's very little sourced biographical info (in fact none). The Financial Times article is about a 'passive' house in New York with only a mention of Bere's London house in the penultimate paragraph. He hasn't been the subject of multiple significant news coverage and neither has any one of his projects. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Sionk (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

oppose: clearly the article has only started, with plenty to be added in time, and the four references are good, despite the opinion noted above. Passive House is a notable design strategy, and clearly this architect is a leading figure of that in the UK. Warren (talk) 09:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (converse)  @ 18:57, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is stubby, but there's enough references to establish baseline notability. -- Jayron  32  02:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Independent article proves his notability. Agree with Jayron32 that it just needs more love.CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.