Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bibis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Justin Bibis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A duo of VERY young singers who are basically under too soon. Now I can see why they have plenty of sources given what it says but still they fall under too soon it seems. Wgolf (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  02:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  02:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete News coverage is only related to a single event (WP:BLP1E), a single viral video about a pop song. Their only single, "Phir Se Game Uthadein" doesn't seem to have any coverage anywhere. This in addition to falling under WP:TOOSOON, in this case years too soon. Elassint  Hi 03:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It appears to be covered here. The source says they performed their rendition of the anthem in a Coca Cola advertisment.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 12:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep this is not falling under WP:TOOSOON as Justin Bibis were featured in national Coke ad and were interviewed on several t.v shows. Moroever their viral video was also covered by BBC News apart from other reliable news agencies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umais Bin Sajjad (talk • contribs) time, day month year (UTC) — sami  talk 11:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SIGCOV.  sami  talk 11:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep There is coverage in reliable sources, which can be used to expand the article. These include, , , , , and many more. Given that their rise to popularity is recent, it would also be unrealistic to expect extensive coverage outside the realm of news sources. Hence, we have to use what we currently have.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 12:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree with the nomination, it was not a single-event coverage. Faizan (talk) 18:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG due to significant coverage- they're a Pakistani group that have been featured in UK, US, India and Australia. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.