Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Deeley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Justin Deeley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an actor with no significant coverage in reliable sources. He has also modeled but that hasn't attracted coverage either. He has been signed to play a recurring role in the fourth season of 90210, but that does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER. Coverage consists of casting announcements which aren't significant. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:PROMOTION. - DonCalo (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 02:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * delete does not meet WP:ENT. LibStar (talk) 14:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep He's had parts in several notable TV shows and films, and has appeared in other media as a model. He seems to meet WP:NMODEL. Rednevog (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The shows may be notable, but his roles in the shows are not significant. Nor is there any coverage about his modelling career that I could find.  Can you explain which criteria of notability guidelines is satisfied? -- Whpq (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs significant roles in multiple notable shows to meet WP:ENT/WP:NMODEL. Novaseminary (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.