Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Galvis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Justin Galvis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources. Fails WP:BIO. Conifer (talk ) 21:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, and due to total lack of evidence of meeting WP:PROF--not a single paper on his Google Scholar profile. Everymorning (talk) 22:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-created article, no published sources. Looie496 (talk) 20:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now (draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  05:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not appear that WP:GNG is met. A WP:BEFORE search results with very few results. Mostly things like Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. Mkdw talk 15:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Created by JGalvis, which most likely means it's a WP:COI (WP:YOURSELF). References aren't great, and there aren't any quality secondary sources provided, nor could I find any in my search. Notability also isn't clearcut. Upjav (talk) 16:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.