Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Higgins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Justin Higgins

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about political blogger fails to show his passing WP:BIO as every cited reference except one is not from a reliable source independent of him... and the one bbc.com citation is an article written by Higgins. While the article mentions being interviewed by Rush Limbaugh on his program "for 40 minutes" (no citation/coverage by a reliable source), not all such interviewees of Rush garner independent coverage in reliable sources, meaning that such incidences do not mean an automatic qualification for WP:BIO. B.Wind (talk) 03:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete: The purpose of that BBC feature was precisely to represent the views of ordinary, unremarkable voters; it could not confer notability. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable blogger. Agree with Gonzonoir, that BBC article hardly helps. Fails WP:BIO. § FreeRangeFrog
 * Delete per nom and Gonzonoir. THF (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.