Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Hubly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article is a strictly negative BLP, so even if this individual were marginally notable this isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia. Consensus is that this individual is non-notable per NOTNEWS/1EVENT. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 12:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Justin Hubly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Where to start. WP:NOTNEWS, WP:1EVENT, and WP:BIO apply. red dogsix (talk) 02:19, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - Please forgive any formatting errors as I'm a longtime wikipedia editor who is new to adding completely new articles. I tried to move this to "The People Vs. Justin Hubly." If that satisfies all the stated concerns I would appreciate it if the deletion notice would be removed so I can move it. Jboud (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)JBoud
 * Comment - Once the AfD is complete the tag will be removed. AfDs generally last 7 days.  red dogsix (talk) 04:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - I, the creator, agree that it needs to be deleted and moved. What is the point of leaving the notice up for 7 days. Why not just allow me to move it? Jboud (talk) 04:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)JBoud
 * Edit & Move I think this would be an okay article if it was edited down (too many details) and information was included in a new article People Vs. Justin Hubly and information was included to indicate newsworthiness.
 * Comment Jboud you are welcome to set up a new article in your own sandbox and work to make it more Wikipedia-ready.
 * Note: this was really bad advice. What we now have at User:Jboud/sandbox is a copy-pasted duplicate of the original.  Please see Copying within Wikipedia for why this is a (very) bad idea.  I've gone ahead and deleted that copy unde WP:G6.  If you want to start a new article, from scratch, that's acceptable.  But don't just copy-paste the existing one to use as a starting point.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see a move changing the fundamentals here: WP:NOTNEWS. Bondegezou (talk) 14:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Neither the person nor the trial are notable.  The coverage is not substantial, it's all local WP:MILL coverage of a court case, or WP:DAILYMAIL gossip coverage of "high school teacher has sex with student". power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NOTNEWS.  Most of the sources are local media, so fails WP:AUD (yes, I know AUD is listed under WP:NCORP, but the same logic applies here) and WP:MILL.  Fails WP:1EVENT.  Fails WP:BIO.  Do not move this to another title; that doesn't solve anything.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.