Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Rascati


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Frank  |  talk  16:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Justin Rascati

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of meeting WP:ATHLETE, af2 is semi-proffesional Delete Secret account 13:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 13:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 13:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE:
 * fully professional level of a sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis. Nope. af2 isn't professional at all.
 * competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships. Didn't even make it, as He had a tryout with the Chicago Bears of the National Football League (NFL) and the Montreal Alouettes of the Canadian Football League (CFL), but neither team chose to sign him. (from the article). Cheers.  I 'mperator 13:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete af2 not fully professional.-- Giants27 T/  C  19:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, due to not meeting WP:BIO, not due to not meeting WP:ATHLETE. WP:ATHLETE is an additional (more lenient) criteria, which decreases notability standards. Strikehold (talk) 00:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, based on same grounds stated by Strikehold. I find no non-trivial coverage for Rascati after doing both a Newsbank and a google news search.  Cbl62 (talk) 02:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.