Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Yoshimura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Justin Yoshimura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable and promotional. The references are the usual PR and notices, and do not indicate notability  DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. References are not "the usual PR and notices" as nominator states. There is an article focused on the subject in the Wall Street Journal, this Daily Breeze piece, another Wall Street Journal, and other mentions in TechCrunch, New York Times, among others.--Bernie44 (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC, as per a review of available sources, which includes significant coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources. North America1000 14:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep – He's invested in a number of successful companies, along with founded a company that raised a significant amount of money. Check his profile on CrunchBase. Pilot333 (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets GNG, I get a good amount of hits when searching his name from notable sources (NYT, WSJ) where he is well mentioned. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 01:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm also finding it hard to label this page as WP:PROMO, it's objectively written and well sourced. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 01:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.