Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Yurek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Justin Yurek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Fails WP:ONEEVENT: the subject appears to have testified before Congress once and is otherwise non-notable (Wikipedia is not a list of every person to ever appear before Congress). The article describes him as CEO of a company, and the user that created the article shares that name: IdWatchdog.  The company that he runs does not have its own page, nor does it appear to warrant one.  The article was previously proposed for deletion via prod and was saved by Varbas.  FrumpyTheClown (talk) 04:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  —FrumpyTheClown (talk) 05:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge: Lexis returns about 21 hits on the guy and about 36 on the organization. Still, it might be better to merge it all into ID Watchdog, as he doesn't appear to have any notability separately, and that would allow us to get rid of the Haley's comet-full moon nonsense. — Bdb484 (talk) 00:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If we had the article on the company, and it appeared to meet WP:CORP, I would say merge. But, as it is, delete. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  14:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Testifying before Congress and acting like a lawyer-proclaimed "expert witness" in court i a fair cry from anything like real world notability of any sort. DreamGuy (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.