Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Fram (talk) 10:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Justin fox

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable journalist who, while has authored a couple of articles, fails WP:CREATIVE. Zim Zala Bim talk  23:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep With some effort, I am finding significant evidence that this man in influential. Much of it is in blogs, but some of it is in proper articles from reliable sources:, .  His 2001 article in Fortune  has 15 cites: , most in high-profile peer-reviewed journals.  This suggests he is a figure who is both influential in academic and financial news circles.  While I am open to more detailed discussion if people dispute my recommendation, I am inclined to recommend a keep based on these observations.  Cazort (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Cazort. Iowateen (talk) 02:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. If Salon call him "Time magazine's excellent business reporter", then I think he's notable. There's an article in India Times reporting on Fox reporting on Bangalore's economy:.There are sources out there, just need adding. Fences and windows (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Other editors have found sourcing that shows notability. Edward321 (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.