Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justine Zwerling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per nom.

Thanks for your contributions and assuming good faith with this decision. If you have a problem with it, please bring up your concerns at Deletion review. Thank you and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Justine Zwerling

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Just a person doing her job. The first block uses two profiles to construct the article from X of Y clickbait sites. No secondary coverage.  scope_creep Talk  21:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a biography of her in the Jerusalem Post, although it toes the line between independent and interview. Mlb96 (talk) 07:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I saw that. It is primary, and completly non-secondary. Interviews are generally primary unless the person is a celeb, pop star or model, in which case it needs sufficiently detailed. This person is doing their job as a department head. They're is three reference that mention her, but they are no more than profiles; the rest of the article is build on effectively, a kind of workaround. It is a BLP with no secondary sourcing.   scope_creep Talk  11:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Based on my research and review of the article and its sources, WP:BASIC notability does not appear supported at this time. The JPost source is a start, and the most prominent listicle honors describe her as a 'future leader', but it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for a standalone article without more WP:SECONDARY coverage of her and her accomplishments. Beccaynr (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.