Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justmop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Justmop

 * – ( View AfD View log )

entirely reliant on sources that do not meet WP:NCORP: some are just notices of funding, the others, including the National, are promotional interviews that are not truly independent. The user's contributions and deleted contributions raise the possibility of COI. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teckpert  DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 03:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 03:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, fails NCORP. The National and Saudi Gazette are real but I'm not sure about the other sources in the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete precisely as nominated; fails to establish any claim, let alone proof, of notability. Not to mention, the entire article contents belong on the company's marketing materials, not in an encyclopaedia. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.