Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juweinat Omar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Juweinat Omar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There isn't significant independent coverage in reliable sources. The numerous references are mostly to cases which just refer to the subject in his role as defence counsel. I'm not able to find any references substantially about the subject. I don't think one paragraph in the Charles Waterstreet piece in the Sydney Morning Herald is enough. Boneymau (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete . Dishonest spam, so may cases of the supplied references not even coming close to supporting the claims made. References dumped in seemingly randomly to make the subject seem more significant. Typical of PR articles from undeclared paid editors. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete speedy even. Blatant promo with very misrepresentative to possibly fallacious references.  I have seen better written hoax and april fool material.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.