Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyoti Deshpande


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Jyoti Deshpande

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The page is purely promotional, and the references are essentially press releases or sponsored posts pretending to be journalistic articles (WP:ADMASQ). This specific sentence indicates the promotional intent of the page, as it mentions the discovery of the "love of her life, Sanjay Deshpande." CGGCA201 (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. CGGCA201 (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The article has verifiable references to prove its notability. The following two references gives details of her being Viacom18 CEO and her life journey as a tuition teacher to present and her being MD and Group CEO of Eros International. All the companies she has worked for and working for are well known and notable..
 * Her role as Co-Chair of, the Media & Entertainment Committee, FICCI can be proven by following references
 * The following reference will tell her struggle in early life due to polio to being CEO.
 * She is India's most influential businesswomen can be proved from following reference
 * She was Forbes The Emergent 25 Asia's Latest Star Businesswomen (2018) and reference to prove is its official website with her profile
 * Bollywood Hungama has her celebrity profile with most of the filmography and other details and reference for same is as follows
 * All the above verifiable references are from notable sources and proves her to be eligible for being an article on wikipedia. I agree it can be improved with more citations and editing. Thank You. DSN18 (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment. Style issues, like the "love of her life" phrase, can be resolved by editing and do not require deletion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, It needs styling improvements and do not require deletion. DSN18 (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. "love of her life" phrase, can be edited and can be improved and does not require deletion. Thank You. DSN18 (talk — Preceding undated comment added 13:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The only reliable sources used are simple news announcements of this person getting one job or another. This is about the best one, rest is less useful. Oaktree b (talk) 18:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems to have enough referencing to support notability and quality. - Indefensible (talk) 21:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Can be resolved by editing and do not require deletion. The article has enough notable references to prove its quality. Strivedi1 (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Vote-stacking by User:Strivedi1, an account was formed after the discussion began. This ID also expressed a keep vote in favor of another ongoing AfD discussion, which involved a page created by the same editor responsible for creating the page of Jyoti Deshpande. CGGCA201 (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, CGGCA201,
 * Please review WP:ASPERSIONS. If you have evidence of misconduct, you know where you can report it. Please do not cast aspersions in deletion discussions when an editor disagrees with you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz I have taken note of it. Thank you. CGGCA201 (talk) 02:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 07:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep as per WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCER. Fade258 (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I was on the fence about this one per Oaktree b. I don't agree that she meets WP:PRODUCER for presumed notability, the criteria for which are somewhat stricter than merely being a producer. However there does seem to be sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources to meet WP:BASIC. It is, in my opinion, a closer run thing than this snowy consensus would suggest, but it does cross the line. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.