Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Károly Doncsecz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:SNOW) Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Károly Doncsecz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An obscure potter. No sources except for what can be found in different wikipedias. Eleassar my talk 20:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete unless sources are found. There are a few hits out there but nothing obviously backing it up except the linked profile. I want to give it a chance but sourcing would probably need somebody to check a library of Hungarian publications of the era. --Dhartung | Talk 00:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The delition is unacceptable. As long as literature, i write. Károly Doncsecz received and famous artist, review this to many book, article and the Slovenski utrinki slovenian tv programme. Doncsecz
 * The awards of Károly Doncsecz


 * Live Exhibition of Folk art in Körmend Award, 1978.
 * Handicraft Exhibition in Szentgotthárd charter, 1978.
 * KIOSZ silver ring, 1978.
 * KIOSZ charter, 1982.
 * Master of Folk Art, 1984.
 * Ágoston Pável Memorial plaquette
 * Congress VIII. of HNF Award, 1985.
 * To the Raba country honours, 1999.
 * Order Vitéz 2001.
 * If he was famous and notable as you say it won't be hard to cite reliable written sources to confirm this. --Eleassar my talk 16:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. He was a famous artist, received several awards, there is a permanent exhibition of his works. I see several sources in the article, maybe it would be useful if the ISBN/ISSN of those publications were added, but I have no reason to doubt that they exist. – Alensha   talk  16:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep seems notable for now. Revisit in 6 months if sources don't improve. Hobartimus (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think there are sufficient sources now. --Hkoala (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Apart from that user:Doncsecz have obvious reasons to spread the word, K.D. appears to be a genuine artist, backed by plenty of unrelated sources (at least I checked the Hungarian ones, a dozen at least). Apart from existence he seems to be important enough to keep. --grin &#9998; 18:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - A serious edit is necessary, but it seems he was an important representative of folk art in Hungary, so I don't think deletion is the propper way to go. Viator slovenicus (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable. Stifle (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - traditions and traditional social values, genuine artist, awards, Master of Folk Art (important in international culture) Tamas Szabo (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - see the sources. --Marcuspater (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't see how the question of notability could be raised. Adam78 (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.