Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kåre Hedebrant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn LibStar (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Kåre Hedebrant

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:ENT. only 1 major role. has been nominated for awards but that is not the same as winning them. LibStar (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if one lead role in a notable film isn't enough to meet WP:ENT, a point that's been repeatedly debated, a simple GNews search turns up more than enough commentary on the subject and his performance to satisfy the GNG. Besides, the "Fangoria Chainsaw" award is more significant than most of the awards that have been (regrettably) recognized by consensus here as significant enough to contribute to notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Hullaballoo. –SJ +  18:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Hullaballoo.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Also has the lead in the upcoming Amors Baller (and the cited article calls him "one of Sweden's biggest film talents"). That gives him 2 leading roles, surely enough to meet the applicable notability criterion, and the article is amply cited.--Yngvadottir (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep multiple nominations meet WP:ANYBIO. Coverage in multiple independent sources meets WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.