Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 ColliZion 2009 Croatia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

K-1 ColliZion 2009 Croatia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

another non notable sporting event that fails to get third party coverage. 1 gnews hit. . LibStar (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  —GregorB (talk) 20:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a minor sporting event, with little mention by independent sources. See List_of_K-1_events for a large list of martial arts events.  Some editors are, in good faith, creating WP articles for each individual event.  Better is to merge all results into one article, because most of the individual events are not notable. --Noleander (talk) 15:41, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is some reliable coverage in the Croatian media: The second link is definitely more than just WP:NOTNEWS, it is a rather detailed account of the event with full results and descriptions of the individual fights. Granted, it is a minor sporting event, arguably of borderline notability, so this really is a weak keep. GregorB (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Even though the Croatian article gives a detailed report of the fights it still seems to be mainly routine sports coverage of an event with few notable fighters. Astudent0 (talk) 12:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete While that second article was an excellent report on the event, I don't think it shows notability. It still seems to be ordinary sports coverage to me. Papaursa (talk) 00:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.