Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Fighting Network Scandinavian Qualification 2007


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No consensus on Hawaii, delete the rest. Courcelles 02:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

K-1 Fighting Network Scandinavian Qualification 2007

 * – ( View AfD View log )

also nominating: another sprawling series of results listing of sporting events that gets no indepth third party coverage and fail WP:GNG. there has to be more than sherdog.com to establish notability. they all fail WP:EVENT as well. LibStar (talk) 07:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * K-1 UK MAX Tournament 2007 Pain & Glory
 * K-1 Fighting Network Romania 2007
 * K-1 World Grand Prix 2007 in Hawaii
 * K-1 Italy Oktagon 2007
 * K-1 Gladiators 2007 in Estonia
 * K-1 World MAX 2007 World Elite Showcase
 * K-1 Rules European Warriors 2007
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

 Delete All - poorly referenced and barely notable, and per nominator's arguments. Interchangable (talk) 01:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all but the Hawaiian event That event featured a world title fight for the heavyweight championship of the world's premier kickboxing organization. Astudent0 (talk) 14:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The events were held by the world's biggest promotion and featured world title fights and many notable fighters. -- WölffReik (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2011
 * having notable fighters does not mean automatic notability. World's biggest promotion? Do you have reliable sources to back that claim? LibStar (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.