Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 Preliminary Marseilles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 02:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 Preliminary Marseilles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

also nominating: another series of non notable sporting results that clearly fail WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * K-1 Rising 2002
 * K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 Preliminary North America
 * K-1 Japan MAX 2002
 * K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 Preliminary Melbourne
 * K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 Preliminary Netherlands
 * K-1 World Grand Prix 2002 in Nagoya
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing WP:GNG. Merge together if a few more refs can be found. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete all More events that are just routine sports reporting without any indication of notability. Papaursa (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Routine coverage of non-notable events. At best, these events were K-1 qualifying events for qualifying events. Astudent0 (talk) 18:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all as per nome and Astudent0. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 15:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note on relisting: I relisted due to the number of articles nominated, I feel there should be more discussion.--v/r - TP 15:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * despite everyone !voting delete? LibStar (talk) 08:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep All WP:EVENT reads "Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance and meet the general notability guideline, or if they have a significant lasting effect." These events determine the champions and rankings for the contenders of K-1. Therefore these results of these events have significant lasting effects and thus meet the criteria for WP:EVENT.--Ryan.germany (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * a new interest in kickboxing Ryan? These events do not determine champions or top rankings, they are qualifying events for other events. Many of the participants are non notable. Where is the significant enduring coverage to prove they meet WP:EVENT? LibStar (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:RECENTISM, WP:EVENT, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:NSPORTS. All these pages fail every aspect of EVENT. No persistence, no scope, no depth, no effect, no diversity. Plus no independent sources. These pages are each unsourced preliminary results. Not all sporting events are notable. As an aside, we rarely have articles on individual soccer matches or baseball games, even though these have prominent visibility in national sports sections. If Wikipedia is not a newspaper, it's definitely not a sports section. Would not object if all K-1 events were merged into articles for each year, as a possible compromise. With exceptions, AfD procedure after AfD procedure has shown User:LibStar deletion is the common practice. I tend to agree, at least in the cases above. BusterD (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.