Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-9 Mail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

K-9 Mail

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources do Not Provide evidence that this app is notable, sources are all routine coverage. See related AFD Discussion: Articles for deletion/Samsung Email PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 20:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep This may not be as competitive currently, but it holds great historical significance as one of the first apps to give users a choice beyond the default for email on Android. I've added a couple sources from books in the early 2010s showing that this was an important application for email. On a less grounded note, Mozilla has recently acquired this application with a goal of revitalizing it. If the page isn't significant enough for historical reasons, I'd like to request that the deletion gets delayed for a bit (maybe a year?) to see if it regains a greater following. I think this would be preferable to deleting it now only to re-create it in the future when it is even more notable. Teeks99 (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. In addition to the sources in the article already, Linux Voice did a decent little review of it in 2014. Was included in The Rough Guide to the best Android apps  and many more small capsule reviews. Skynxnex (talk) 20:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Changes since the nomination have added three additional refrences, there is definitely room for improvement but its also definitely notable. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.