Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.E.G.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted as an article about a band which makes no assertion of the notability of its subject. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 09:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

K.E.G.
Band does not meet WP:MUSIC criteria; it appears to be a well intentioned attempt by the author to add his own band to Wikipedia. Please note that this is a new contributor (first day) so try not to WP:BITE on opinions.--Isotope23 17:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, it is here for people to see. It should not be deleted.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweens6591 (talk • contribs) This coming from a guy who is against gay marriage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweens6591 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NN. I'll Bite. User's first edit was vandalism JungleCat    talk / contrib  17:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment yes, but after that initial edit, the user has been making reasonable (non-vandalism) edits (this is fairly irrelevant to the discussion but all other reversions I did were because the changes were not WP:V.. presume a new user would not be familiar with that). Again, lets try to assume good faith here.--Isotope23 17:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Allright, I'll assume good faith Struck out earlier text JungleCat    talk / contrib  17:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment no personal attacks Sweens6591...--Isotope23 17:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, absolutely non-notable, certainly fails WP:MUSIC, probably WP:NFT, and a possible WP:SNOW candidate once you actually read the article. -- Kinu t /c  19:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, speedy A7 if possible... where is the assertion of notability? -- Kinu t /c  05:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 19:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, just some kid with a band, same as millions of others. Ned Wilbury 20:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.