Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.V.Dominic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

K.V.Dominic

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I have taken this article to afd as there is no reference provided in the article.Only 3 external links that too are questionable.Written like a unencyclopedic article.I strongly recommend deletion of the article.Also the subject is non notable.No significant awards or works. --Poet009 (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 0 Gscholar, books' existence confirmed by Gbooks, but they only seem to be held in a single-digit number of libraries on Worldcat. Fails WP:PROF. Ray  Talk 01:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N, WP:PROF. --Ragib (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable Infinitely Humble (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.