Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. L. Dhammajoti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

K. L. Dhammajoti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Quite questionably notable and improvable because all my searches found absolutely nothing better than this and the current version would need to be improved so unless there are some local archived sources, there's not much to suggest keeping this basically unchanged article from December 2009. Pinging, and. SwisterTwister  talk  06:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 16:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. meets WP:PROF--endowed professorship at University of Hong Kong. Head of a notable College about which we have an article. Holder of a visiting chair a University of Calgary,for which there is   reliable documentation . People in his field are sometimes impossible to document  here  unless they become connected with  the Western academic system--fortunately, he has  DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I agree that he doesn't pass WP:GNG through the search engines, as per DGG, he definitely passes WP:PROF.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.