Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Thor Jensen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 22:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

K. Thor Jensen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Person is not notable under WP:GNG; the text reads like an advertisement for his work. TheNate (talk) 00:24, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Jensen has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources such as the Wall Street Journal. —Torchiest talkedits 14:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * So a single mention in a WSJ blog and a couple of interviews with small websites = notable? If so, Wikipedia will have to be vastly expanded to accommodate many others with similar credentials. TheNate (talk) 23:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)




 * Weak delete - Nothing inherently notable about this person. 11coolguy12 (talk) 08:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment He's also an editor at UGO.com. —Torchiest talkedits 13:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Rangoondispenser (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.