Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2-371


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2022. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

K2-371

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No coverage except for discovery papers where this is one of a great many stars found to have exoplanets. Fails WP:NASTRO. Lithopsian (talk) 15:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2022 where the companion is already listed. Exoplanets are a dime a dozen these days, so more evidence of notability is needed. Praemonitus (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: It's just an uremarkable K-type star with a Jupiter-like exoplanet. If it at least talked about the star, maybe we could head for redirect.Speed doesn&#39;t always mean quality. - 400Weir (talk) 03:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I just improved the article, but there's no notability beside 9 papers over 6 years of observation. Speed doesn&#39;t always mean quality. (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect or delete. It's just another boring orange star. Even if it has a planet, it isn't very notable. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 20:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.