Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K6rn?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. even wiith the sockpuppet nominator, the article is unsalvagable JForget  03:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

K6rn?

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Neologism without evidence of notability. Jennifer500 (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete, borderline speedy as a hoax.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note, nominator blocked for ban evasion. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism. At best. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, WP:DICDEF. Cnilep (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.