Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDCalc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 14:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

KDCalc
This was previously deleted per WP:PROD, but was contested. it is a non-notable software product and reads like an advertisement. Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and as per WP:SPAM and possibly WP:VANITY ST47 16:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Wickethewok 20:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with substantial cleanup required. Number of GHits suggests notability. The article is pretty spammy at the moment but could be salvaged. Paddles TC 03:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recently edited to remove all non-npov and add objective criticisms. Is now purely informational. KDCalc 01:05, 19 August 2006 (CST)
 * Delete I can't see how it passes notability.--Runcorn 20:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.