Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KD Subdivision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

KD Subdivision

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It exists, but I couldn't establish how it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Kentucky,  and Tennessee. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: We need more participation here from those editors who work on railroad articles or are knowledgeable about them. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. A 161-mile railway line will pass as a geographic feature; sourcing the history shouldn't be a problem. I'll see what I can do to make the article more presentable. Mackensen (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * While I'd consider rail lines to almost always be notable, I question whether the CSX subdivision is the notable topic. Subdivisions are things made up by someone at CSX headquarters in Jacksonville, and do not necessarily correlate to lines as a whole, or to notable topics. This article is one of many mass-produced by an editor who decided every single CSX subdivision should have an article, irrespective of sourcing, notability, or if it even made sense to do so. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a fair point, although in this case the "KD" name goes back to the L&N in the 1970s: . Mackensen (talk) 02:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I can only find primary sources briefly talking about the rail line. What's used now for sourcing in the article is trivial. Oaktree b (talk) 14:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Oaktree b I don't think that's a fair description of Kincaid Herr's book. Mackensen (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * What about merging this and other CSX subdivisions to "List of CSX Transportation lines"? Some of this data is already included in the list article. We could expand the list by one column for a capsule history of each subdivision. -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count)  01:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I would think that's inappropriate for a list article, especially one that's 36 KB already. These lines have their own history and are geographically distinct. Mackensen (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. This article has been improved. The CSX subdivisions, divisions, and regions need a much deeper dive than just this AfD. gidonb (talk) 03:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Still no evidence of significant coverage in multiple sources.  Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 07:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.