Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEI Industries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

KEI Industries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clear advertising with clear signs the company itself contributed to it, not only in the simplicity this is only what's advertised to clients, but the sources are clear paid press, press releases in both publishing and republishing and all other triviality; nothing else found was better at all which is simply PR at all; we've established the notorious establishing of advertising in these subjects and places, and this is no different, regardless of the stock exchange, since there's questionability in those as it is. Overall, this is enough violations for removal in our policies since we never accept advertising; note the persistence in the past 2 deletions, and this current article started immediately after (note that all accounts suggest employees and IPs are clear company-used). SwisterTwister  talk  03:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014  (talk • contribs) 03:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014  (talk • contribs) 03:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- despite being a public company, the subject of the article appears to be rather unremarkable. The sources do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH to build a balanced, non-promotional article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment This is an international, publicly traded company with income for the year ending Mar16 of approximately 1 billion dollars .  Unscintillating (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * my calculation is 1 Cr Rupees =$160 thousand, so a/c the infobox it is 3,000 Cr 2030 Cr. Rupees = $320 million, not $1 billion.  DGG ( talk ) 08:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know where you are getting "3000 Cr. Rupees", or what period of time this represents. I documented the 1 billion for the year ending Mar16 on the talk page as part of a refutation for your speedy delete.  Unscintillating (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You're right, my typo: a/c the article's infobox it was 2,030 Crore.  DGG ( talk ) 05:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC), which is = $320 M. What's your figure from?  DGG ( talk ) 05:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The article has a cn tag on that figure and I know because I put it there. So your source remains unknown.  The figure I got was from gurufocus.com.  But I see now that that page says, "All numbers are in their own currency."  Which if that means 958 million rupees may be closer to 15 million than 1 billion dollars.  I've again looked but was not able to find numbers to verify.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * According to their own 2016 report, they had total revenue of 25,261,000rs which amounts to approx US$371,000 -- HighKing ++ 18:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing on that page "(Rs, in Millions)", which if that means 25,261,000,000 Indian rupees, Google tells that is "371591836.10000 US dollars" or $370 million. Unscintillating (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment -- the stock is part of "micro-cap" stocks, so it's got to be closer to $15M, definitely not a $1B. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not even. See above. -- HighKing ++ 18:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 18:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.