Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KENSRI School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and move to Kensri School. (non-admin closure) — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  17:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

KENSRI School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indicator of significance of the school, no real information about the school except for its being in India. The rest of the article is all promotional and has no real information content - it just consists of what the school allegedly believes and is unsourced. Upjav (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - the page's creator also created an article for Kensri School in 2008 that was speedily deleted. Upjav (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep or Redirect per new evidence. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC) *Delete. It's only  here at  AfD because we can't A7 schools.-- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment the article is a deplorable piece of fluffy gibberish, but the school is real, it's located in Bangalore, and has classes up to 12th grade, see here, and there's alot of coverage in the news about it, just click on the "news" link up there. Kraxler (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Problem is, if you take out all he fluffy gibberish there's nothing left but the name. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is a verifiable high school per the source Kraxler found. We generally keep high schools. The current article is promotional fluff which needs to be done over. Is WP:TNT necessary? Rewriting a clean stub sounds like a viable option to me. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. I have reverted the article to an earlier very stubby version, before it was gutted by an IP last October, which does at least contain some of the basic information about the school. The one reference in the restored article, to the school's previous website, is now dead but seems to have been captured by the Wayback Machine, and I will see if I can use this in the article in place of the deadlink - we need more sources, but User:Kraxler has demonstrated that these exist. There are a lot of earlier (and longer) versions of the article than the one I have reverted to - of the few I looked at, none looked measurably better but someone else might have better luck. PWilkinson (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per these results, Not happy with the article at all but notability does seem to just be there!, I nearly !voted Delete as the article's been virtually blanked and I have a feeling it won't ever get improved beyond what it is now but I genuinely hope someone can prove me wrong!. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.