Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEmulator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

KEmulator

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable software; fails GNG. Article is currently sourced only with its own website and a blog post. (declined PROD) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 14:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 16:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found nothing to claim notability of this software. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep: many people use this software. — user:Yogwi21 —Preceding undated comment added 12:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've list some reliable source. — user:Yogwi21 —Preceding undated comment added 06:41, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Your "some reliable source" is an anonymous blog post in a collective blog accepting anyone's contributions, which is nowhere close to passing WP:IRS. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't appear to be notable software, and the article doesn't even try to claim it is. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete First of all, it fails WP: GNG with no reliable sources, and second of all, the article has no claims of notability. Electric Catfish 14:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above (WP:GNG). All I can find is blog posts and youtube videos, nothing that would make it appear notable. If it was notable, I would expect some news articles or such on it. LlamaDude78 (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.