Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KFFL.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  04:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

KFFL.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Website with no claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. NN, fails WP:WEB. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom, unless this site can establish notability. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. A google search for "KFFL.com -wikipedia" retrieves 280,000 hits. Is that notable? Kingturtle (talk) 19:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions says not necessarily.--Fabrictramp (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom, borderline advert. - Dravecky (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand. Site is 11 years old and provides content to major US newspapers. Seems to be notable.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Any chance you can point us towards some sources that show notability? I couldn't find any. Thanks.--Fabrictramp (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * While I like this website, no evidence of meeting WP:WEB, Delete Secret account 06:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.