Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KISS (algorithm)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As evidence of notability has emerged. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

KISS (algorithm)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The notability tag was added 3 weeks ago by Altenmann. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 03:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete (weak) Keep current sources are primary, so fails WP:GNG. I haven't searched for more, but articles ideally should be created based on WP:RS and I've not heard of this. If any are uncovered change to Keep. Widefox ; talk 16:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are secondary sources. A 2013 book on Monte Carlo Methods calls it a "very good" generator and presents it as the only example of a pseudo-random number generator, with references as to where to find others. There is a complete discussion of KISS. I've added the reference to Further reading in the article. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, didn't have time to check. There's  etc. !vote changed.  Widefox ; talk 10:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.