Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KJ Dhaliwal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The author was a blocked sock (G5), and it's snowing down below anyway. Girth Summit  (blether) 12:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

KJ Dhaliwal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not pass WP:GNG /WP:BIO.
 * The Forbes article is authored by a brand builder.
 * Nothing about the subject in the TOI article.
 * Source 3 is a blog.
 * nytimes article is an opinion piece.
 * No significant coverage and a primary source.
 * Looks like the dealstreetasia article is about the app Dil Mil.
 * qz.com is about the app again.
 * techcrunch.com is about the app. WP:TECHCRUNCH
 * has no mention of the subject. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, India,  and United States of America. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business,  and Internet. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: subject lacks GNG as most of the sources available online are press releases, passing mentions, etc. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per source analysis by Jeraxmoira. To satisfy GNG articles need significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources which the subject of the article does not have. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sources are just about his company, that too mostly about fundings. No independent sources about the subject. Lacks GNG 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 19:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Punjab, California,  and Pennsylvania.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete The individual doesn't meet WP:GNG, and the sources provided aren't independent reliable secondary sources. Blogs, opinions, and primary sources can't establish notability. Grabup (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Kind of close, but not close enough. I think the Dil Mil app could be notable, so this can be redirected there if an article for Dil Mil is made. Cleo Cooper (talk) 01:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.