Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KKKZ Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete (G11) Also WP:SNOW and creator's statement "KKKZ is an up and coming production company. We are very small as of right now, and we have no works of note that have been published."-- Hús  ö  nd  04:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

KKKZ Productions

 * — (View AfD)

Non notable business, User:Aagtbdfoua marked it for speedy, but its been contested by the original author. Brian | (Talk) 00:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Spam and non notable at that. Kind Regards -  Heligoland  |   Talk  |   Contribs  00:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Rettetast 01:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops. I mistakenly told Brian that I had marked it as speedy.  I had actually marked it as prod.  Same difference, this should be speedily deleted as a blatant advert. - Aagtbdfoua 01:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:SPAM and WP:CORP. MER-C 02:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable.  Hagerman ( talk ) 02:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Based on all (7) google results being from the official site, fails WP:V, WP:CORP and a few more guidelines mentioned above. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  P.B. Pilh e  t  /  Talk  03:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom, appears to advert, non notable. Navou   talk  03:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.