Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KLIA East @ Labu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

KLIA East @ Labu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Cancelled airport, unlikely to be ever built. It was mentioned in the news for the roughly two-month period in 2008-2009, but after being shelved no one talked about it anymore. Half of the article is POV arguments for or against the proposed airport. IMO, fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Joshua Say "hi" to me!What I've done? 18:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep In my view, major controversial proposals that receive significant coverage (such as building an international airport) are unlikely to be ruled out on WP:CRYSTAL, even if they fail. There's more than enough here for a well-sourced article, as the sources actually in the article show. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Mkativerata. Ray  Talk 02:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.