Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KLM Meet&Seat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to KLM. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

KLM Meet&Seat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I changed this to a redirect. Creator thinks I should have deleted it instead (see edit summary on reversion of my redirect), so I am suggesting it be deleted as insufficient to stand alone and requiring a redirect to KLM. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not how I read the edit summary; the other editor thought you should have placed this content into KLM, merging the pages rather than just replacing this with a redirect. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks NG, you are correct. The article was simply obliterated within minutes of its creation, without discussion or even notification, when it was re-directed without saving any of the contents. When I reverted the re-direct the same person nominated the article for deletion. Check if you like: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=KLM_Meet%26Seat&diff=479171239&oldid=479168710 Ottawahitech (talk) 03:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge with KLM. Doen't need a separate article. Harry the Dog WOOF  15:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with KLM. This should only be a small comment in the airline's article.  PK  T (alk)  23:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I am disappointed (but not surprised) that no one has added anything to this article, which is about a novel and interesting idea that may be of  interest to many. There is a lot more in the reference which I have not had a chance to add to Wikipedia, for example there is another airline  which also added a social network feature. If I wasn't kept busy trying to save content from deletions, I would  have more time to dedicate to actually building up this great resource, sigh...
 * As far as simply merging it into the existing KLM article, I wonder if any of the proponents of the merge idea have looked to see where it might fit in, and what could be done with this category if the article is merged? When I first created this article I thought of including it it in the existing KLM article, but could not figure out how to do it. I hope some of the proponents of the merge will take on this challenge. Ottawahitech (talk) 03:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Additional comment When articles are re-direected as a result of a merge decision in these types of discussions, what happens is that the original article's history is wiped out. No one (other than wiki-admins possibly) can verify that contents have been preserved. Here is an example: Scotia Centre Mall (Saskatoon), where the only remaining history entry I can see says:


 * (cur | prev) 11:55, 3 March 2012‎ Martijn Hoekstra (talk | contribs)‎ . . (39 bytes) (+39)‎ . . (Martijn Hoekstra moved page Scotia Centre Mall (Saskatoon) to Scotia Centre

Ottawahitech (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, the history moves along with the pagemove. Previously there was no content and no history on Scotia Centre (Saskatoon) Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to KLM. One sentence is not an article, but it can make a small section in the company article. Diego (talk) 10:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I did the merger with this edit. Diego (talk) 10:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.